| data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49dc4/49dc4b226d83ea713310f2cabc1d324b8ffe5d66" alt="" | Home >> Cabernet >> 2020 Ridge Monte Bello [Half Bottle] | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dce20/dce20f64c7989e59fa9cf555ae539d404ed61d7f" alt="" | | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dce20/dce20f64c7989e59fa9cf555ae539d404ed61d7f" alt="" | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dce20/dce20f64c7989e59fa9cf555ae539d404ed61d7f" alt="" | Qty=4Size=375 ml"Unfortunately, the 2020 Monte Bello is a victim of this harvest's devastating wildfires. Smoke taint is evident from the first pour, after which it receded and then reappeared on and off over the two days I spent with the bottles. The palate tells the same story, with the retronasal signature of campfire smoke and hollowed-out, gritty fruit on the finish. This was only more glaring in the context of a vertical spanning 2021-2015, many of which are banner vintages for Ridge. While an otherwise technically well-made wine is there behind the smoke, albeit with noticeably less depth and concentration than is typical, due to Ridge's decision to bulk out of 90% of the pressed wine, this flaw is unavoidable. In the interest of thoroughness, a sample of the bottled 2020 Monte Bello was submitted to ETS Laboratories in St. Helena, where a series of tests to detect glycosylated smoke markers were carried out (glycosylated tests specifically separate sugar-bound markers from volatile markers that can be imparted by oak élevage). The results confirmed significantly elevated levels of 4-methylguaiacol rutinoside, cresol rutinoside, phenol rutinoside and syringol gentiobioside, all of which correspond to elevated levels of smoke exposure and heightened sensory thresholds by up to a factor of four from the 99th percentile of a non-smoke-affected vintage." - Matthew Luczy, robertparker.com (Apr 18, 2024) |
|
|
|
|